RIO DE JANEIRO — Brazil blocked the social network X on Friday after its owner, Elon Musk, refused to comply with a Brazilian judge’s orders to suspend certain accounts, the biggest test yet of the billionaire’s efforts to transform the site into a digital town square where just about anything goes.
Alexandre de Moraes, a Brazilian Supreme Court justice, ordered the country’s telecom agency to block access to X across the nation of 200 million because the company lacked a necessary legal representative in Brazil.
Musk closed X’s office in Brazil last week after de Moraes threatened arrests for ignoring his orders to remove X accounts that he said broke Brazilian laws.
X said that it viewed de Moraes’ sealed orders as illegal and that it planned to publish them. “Free speech is the bedrock of democracy and an unelected pseudo-judge in Brazil is destroying it for political purposes,” Musk said Friday.
In a highly unusual move, de Moraes also said that any person in Brazil who tried to still use X via common privacy software called a virtual private network, or VPN, could be fined nearly $9,000 a day.
Also, De Moraes froze the finances of a second Musk business in Brazil, SpaceX’s Starlink satellite-internet service, to try to collect $3 million in fines he has levied against X. Starlink — which has recently exploded in popularity in Brazil, with more than 250,000 customers — said it planned to fight the order and would make its service free in Brazil if necessary.
Musk and de Moraes have been sparring for months. Musk says de Moraes is illegally censoring conservative voices. De Moraes says Musk is illegally obstructing his work to clean up the Brazilian internet.
In his order, de Moraes said Musk was an “outlaw” who intended to “allow the massive spread of disinformation, hate speech and attacks on the democratic rule of law, violating the free choice of the electorate, by keeping voters away from real and accurate information.”
The fight is now at the center of Musk’s bid to turn X into a safe haven for people to say nearly anything they want, even if it hurts the business in the process.
In dozens of posts since April, Musk has built up de Moraes as one of the world’s biggest enemies of free speech, and it appears Musk is now betting the judge will cave to the public backlash he believes the block will cause.
“He might be losing money in the short term, but he’s gaining enormous political capital,” said Luca Belli, a professor at FGV Law School in Rio de Janeiro, who has tracked Musk’s strategy with X.
But the longer the blackout on X lasts, the more it will test Musk’s commitment to his ideology at the expense of revenue, market share and influence.
Since 2022, Brazil has ranked fourth globally with more than 25 million downloads of the X app, according to Appfigures, an app data firm. X’s international business has become more important under Musk, as American advertisers have fled the site because of an increase in hate speech and misinformation since Musk bought it.
Musk has overhauled the social network since buying it for $44 billion in 2022, when it was called Twitter. In addition to renaming the service, he jettisoned many of its rules about what users could say. (Although he introduced a new rule against using a term he deems overly liberal: “cisgender.”) He also reinstated suspended accounts, including that of former President Donald Trump.
Yet, Musk said X would still follow the law where it operates. Under his leadership, X has complied with demands from the Indian government to withhold accounts and removed links to a BBC documentary that painted a critical portrait of Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister.
At other times, Musk has battled orders to remove content, such as in Australia, where he fought an order to remove videos depicting a violent attack against a local bishop.
But he has met a formidable challenge in de Moraes.
The U.S. Embassy in Brazil said it was monitoring the dispute. “The United States values freedom of speech as a cornerstone of a healthy democracy,” the embassy said in a statement.
Several authoritarian governments have banned X, including China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. Some other nations have temporarily blocked the site at times. In 2021, Nigeria suspended the service for about seven months after the company removed posts by the country’s then president threatening secessionist groups.
On Friday, de Moraes ordered Brazil’s telecom agency to “adopt all necessary measures” within 24 hours to block people in Brazil from using X.
He also said that people who use VPNs to circumvent the block and access X could face fines of nearly $9,000 a day. VPNs, which can make internet traffic appear as if it was coming from a different country, are common software used for privacy and cybersecurity.
He issued multiple orders Friday. In the first, he also ordered internet providers to block access to X, and he ordered Apple and Google to prevent downloads of X and popular VPN apps.
People across Brazil quickly criticized the move against VPN apps, and about three hours later, de Moraes issued a second order, cutting language about ordering internet providers, Apple and Google to take measures against X or VPN apps.
As a result, it appears the order now relies on Brazil’s telecom agency to force internet and cell-service providers to block access to X, said Carlos Affonso Souza, a Brazilian internet-law professor.
It will become clear in the coming days whether that approach works. X was still online in Brazil by Friday night.
Even with the amendment, Souza called the order “the most extreme judicial decision out of a Brazilian court in 30 years of internet law in Brazil.”
It is not the first time Brazilian authorities have blocked an online service for ignoring court orders. Yet, such blocks have usually lasted just days before a company has reversed course and complied. That was the case in 2022, when de Moraes blocked the messaging app Telegram for a weekend.
Belli, the law professor, said he expected the same with Musk and X. “My bet is that he might be blocked for a couple of days, and then will comply and portray himself as a victim,” Belli said. “So, he’s still winning.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2024 The New York Times Company